What's annoying in porn?

[epi]

Slapping, spitting, all the violent shit. At least in "normal" gonzo films. In SM-themed stuff, okay, not my cup of tea.

[afxacid]

I like a girl to look like shes enjoying herself.
So yea violent stuff and abuse is a big turn off for me.

[inprogress]

[quote name='deeply' date='26 December 2010 - 08:21 PM' timestamp='1293416461' post='236411']
Can't face reality in more of its glory?

That's repressive.
[/quote]

The sex I have comes nowhere close to porn sex. That said, my porn collection portrays my sexual fantasies. I don't want to see some things and I'm finding that HD porn takes away from my fantasy mindset. I suppose it is just my personal preference.

Also, HD porn = longer download times. Annoying.

[jetblasted]

All these damn emoticons bug me.

[Guest deeply]

[quote name='jetblasted' date='22 January 2011 - 09:19 PM' timestamp='1295731196' post='246525']
All these damn emoticons bug me.
[/quote]

It's a medium.

They are sometimes officious, so being officious TO them, is somewhat reflective.

Habitual and clarifying intentions. Sometimes, they even have an ambiguity. That's probably when they piss off most.

ANYWAY, an entry into annoyances... duping.

Had a recent (shame)dupe.

A dupe, is when a scene is COMPLETELY fake from start to stop, but its garbage somehow gets in when going through a menagerie of content. It relates to a niche, so it's looked through. Treating observers as mere means, fully observed, it can also be reciprocated as such. But when that is not in MIND, oh how it then becomes a dupe. Usually, it will be for some act, that on its own, will not be THAT great, but with a particular reaction, is of merit. But this reaction, when of skeptical mind, "this is bullshit," will come up. In this particular situation, a fucking FIRST (can't think of a previous time), due to being repulsed by not finding anything at a particular site, actually had mental maturity weak enough for one time only, to fucking see real, where there was in plain sight, so OBVIOUSLY a fake expression. Pissed. COMPLETELY. Mental discipline, SHATTERED.

Now, being a complete deviant from role play in any sense, sites like BRAZZERS are not even in spectrum. Due to streaming sites, they still turn up in locations where this individual DOES look around for occasional consumables. Turns out this was a BRAZZERS scene. So this individual's integrity was churned up and spat out. A new low.

There's content that's watchable, due to volition of girls involved.

There's content that's watchable, due to content, DESPITE lack of volition of girls involved. This is shoulder shrug at best, while guilt trip at worst. Because most times, it's "she or they're getting anxious over something, if they relaxed, would enjoy," and a minority of times, "this scene is like carrion: picking at a carcass as a mere means, usually scraping bottom of barrel, due to there being no other fresh content around. Put it on tab, use and abuse, then dispose (eye candy afterwards assists)."

And there's a final, most horrid type. Obvious deception. Where it stinks of lies, and a most gullible hat must be worn at all times, to even take a second look. Using this as vulture, is OK. But to sink as low as being DUPED... that's fucked up.

So, now that duping has been EXPLAINED... has anyone else here, been duped? Looking for some sign of help, here. Edited March 29, 2011 by deeply

[Wanting]

I hate it when the girl is staring at the camera the whole time. It's unnatural, it doesn't feel as if she's getting off. I would like to say "Quit staring at me and go about your business."

[Guest deeply]

[quote name='Wanting_it' date='16 April 2011 - 04:38 AM' timestamp='1302928714' post='286796']
I hate it when the girl is staring at the camera the whole time. It's unnatural, it doesn't feel as if she's getting off. I would like to say "Quit staring at me and go about your business."
[/quote]

What if her resting focus was exactly where lens was positioned? Would she then have to deliberately look away?

[Guest deeply]

Girls that do extreme content, and insist on getting a set of silly-cones... which looks worse, plus it does zip for their career. So irrational, it gives Base Jumpers a few more IQ points, due to aggregates having to change. Edited June 27, 2011 by deeply

[hectorknot]

Technical incompetence.

Watching a Jay Sin scene the other day, the audio was terrible. The scene was clearly shot with a mic attached to the camera. Why? Every time the camera moved away, the audio levels dropped, so I couldn't hear. So, I turned the volume up. Then the camera moves back in - and the actress screaming 'fuck my asshole' or whatever is suddenly 3 times as loud and waking up the neighbours!

Why not just set a fixed mic, or get someone to operate a boom? Ok, it keeps costs down but it really is poor.

Similarly, I hate that some producers have no clue about lighting, especially in mixed light. I've seen some potentially great scenes ruined because someone has left their camera on auto white balance and it's struggling to keep up. This is not complicated stuff!

I hate guys who are too agressive/rough when the girl doesn't like it. They make me want to kick the fuck out of them and see how they like it.

Most bisexual porn. It is two gays with a woman on the side. Wrong lineup! It should be two guys fucking a girl with some bi action involved. And why can't we have scenes like Jay Sin where the guy gets some in the ass too?

[joandjames]

Blow jobs that last half the movie piss me off - and they're normally finished off by yet another BORING facial!

[Guest deeply]

[quote name='hectorknot' date='03 July 2011 - 05:12 PM' timestamp='1309713150' post='344826']
Technical incompetence.[/quote]

Best resolution and audio, isn't being generally used. It's what's generally available in what civilian markets have trending towards norming, for whatever cycle it's running by. A production of content, should be based upon being able to notice it is erotica (to prevent too much escapism, such as total macroscopic simulation), but for it not be able to disturb an individual, from accepting it as mastery enough, of our limbic systems: for our psychological and physical health.

"Technical incompetence," doesn't cut it... for a start, content is providing a stable means of an external element (so mental imagery does not reinforce asexual pursuits). To provide enough indirect sexual fascination, to still provide polygamous AND monogamous conduct within society, is a fine balance. Lust, is desire UNTIL love, so a "love of lust," is self-destructive (given other practices of discipline, such as SURVIVAL)... if it does not become a passion to share it responsibly.

Lust's point, is to provide a sensation, enough to temper an individual to some stability. It gets out of control when it directly causes instability. Technological capability of lust, is a political gamble, with socialization and population. It gambles on psyche and survival, basically. So it has to not aim to be an individual's EVENTUAL sole means of sexual solicitation.

Providing expectations of improvement in any technical department, should be done on recording's ability to recognize, it can't measure up to reality... so it has to meet a sensible sub-standard... audibly and visually. This includes content quality itself.

Now, relying upon addiction's ratio to boredom, CAN mean that in a LIMITED production of content, special cases can be produced, but merely in a quality degree... that promotes as much human input as possible. Erotica is a unique experience to actual sex. Both should be considered separate... as differing points of view, lead to differing experiences.

Digression: Caligula should not determine where demand goes and provision follows.

[quote name='hectorknot' date='03 July 2011 - 05:12 PM' timestamp='1309713150' post='344826']
Watching a Jay Sin scene the other day, the audio was terrible. The scene was clearly shot with a mic attached to the camera. Why? Every time the camera moved away, the audio levels dropped, so I couldn't hear. So, I turned the volume up. Then the camera moves back in - and the actress screaming 'fuck my asshole' or whatever is suddenly 3 times as loud and waking up the neighbours![/quote]

Advice: use headphones.

[quote name='hectorknot' date='03 July 2011 - 05:12 PM' timestamp='1309713150' post='344826']
Why not just set a fixed mic, or get someone to operate a boom? Ok, it keeps costs down but it really is poor.[/quote]

Beggars can't be choosers. All are beggars in their lack of ability, place and respect of others.

Does it lack ability in tolerance to criticize what essentially, is a luxury?

Any further engineering of products, due to limited materials available, means that more things manufactured, leads to more scarcity in other areas. It's what can be realized, as a materials market. Arrangements of such materials, produce massive amounts of variation, yet their stability, is based upon how proportionate they are, to managing to cause a minimal amount of contempt.

This means that ANYTHING new (even ideas), have to respect previous things, for their constitution, and not their environment: this gives rights, reason to exist. Without these, utilitarianism will destroy everything... if it is not ETHICAL utilitarianism. Cut something and it will bleed. Allow a thing to suffer, and it will die. But love... and it will be free. Ignorance and neglect, are not forces of responsibility... they are mad. Replacing something sufficient (human being) with something insufficient (technology), will destroy this reality... and THAT, is a given.

[quote name='hectorknot' date='03 July 2011 - 05:12 PM' timestamp='1309713150' post='344826']Similarly, I hate that some producers have no clue about lighting, especially in mixed light. I've seen some potentially great scenes ruined because someone has left their camera on auto white balance and it's struggling to keep up. This is not complicated stuff!
[/quote]

Sets should be indoors. Natural sunlight does not support an artificial lens.

[quote name='hectorknot' date='03 July 2011 - 05:12 PM' timestamp='1309713150' post='344826']
I hate guys who are too agressive/rough when the girl doesn't like it. They make me want to kick the fuck out of them and see how they like it.[/quote]

As knight in shining armor as it may be, everything is everyone's fault. Her fault, is trusting her conditions will be met. His fault, is trusting his conditions will be met by her. And hectorknot's fault, is expecting both of these to align.

Our disturbance and presumption of perception of such, is reasoned through what is destructive, and what is productive. Sex is indicative of neither: it is now an obsolete method of replacing a population, given information available.

A criminal mind doesn't realize humanity is method enough to, command... as it commands respect. Criminals would call this a "superstition" to moral realism... it's ACTUALLY recognizing reality's inability to produce infinite material for structure, but reality to form sustainability of structure, from reason. All desire in any other form is madness.

A post-human world, is death. Recompilation will lead to an inability for a system to have any discipline, from destroying itself... no matter how powerful it is. Exponential instability is chaos. Any signal can be jammed... taking a mind out of a body, will lose its spirit, to disruption. On a metaphysical plane, if fate has no defeat, then a collective mind is death incarnate. Individuals have to exist. Opposing wills have to exist, but in war... it expects every man too much discipline. Abilities have to be limited in their function, and not in their form.

[Finnfist]

In my opinion, the best 'porn' is people wanting to fuck (or do whatever else) and that then being professionally filmed. Anything else takes away from it.

Especially annoying are aspects showing the porn production side of things, e.g.:
-still pictures being taken at the time of filming (shutter noise, flash,...)
-commenting from behind the camera (unless it's gonzo and the cameraperson is also involved in the action)
-semi-documentary-like approach, e.g. discussion of a 'scene' before the action
-music and sound effects, I don't remember a time they would've brought anything positive to the mix, so real sounds only
-heavy/clumsy editing, jumping from one thing to another
-last and but not least, acting, some plot here or there is ok to set up the action, but if the people involved are not into doing it for real, it definitely shows

For these reasons, I definitely prefer the likes of LysXtreme and DirtyGardenGirl that are into it for themselves, i.e. would be doing the same with or without any cameras. Alysa, Isabella and others surely must enjoy everything anal and pushing their limits, unfortunately too often the productions are holding their talent back.

[t.j. the pimp]

[quote name='epi' date='05 January 2011 - 11:10 AM' timestamp='1294251008' post='239638']
Slapping, spitting, all the violent shit. At least in "normal" gonzo films. In SM-themed stuff, okay, not my cup of tea.
[/quote]

i'd like to take part of your comment to use in mine; thing i hate the most is in lesbian porn during the anal fisting scenes, they'll sometimes use spit as substitute for lube; always hated that.

[t.j. the pimp]

[quote name='hectorknot' date='03 July 2011 - 10:12 AM' timestamp='1309713150' post='344826']
Technical incompetence.

Watching a Jay Sin scene the other day, the audio was terrible. The scene was clearly shot with a mic attached to the camera. Why? Every time the camera moved away, the audio levels dropped, so I couldn't hear. So, I turned the volume up. Then the camera moves back in - and the actress screaming 'fuck my asshole' or whatever is suddenly 3 times as loud and waking up the neighbours!

Why not just set a fixed mic, or get someone to operate a boom? Ok, it keeps costs down but it really is poor.

Similarly, I hate that some producers have no clue about lighting, especially in mixed light. I've seen some potentially great scenes ruined because someone has left their camera on auto white balance and it's struggling to keep up. This is not complicated stuff!

I hate guys who are too agressive/rough when the girl doesn't like it. They make me want to kick the fuck out of them and see how they like it.

Most bisexual porn. It is two gays with a woman on the side. Wrong lineup! It should be two guys fucking a girl with some bi action involved. And why can't we have scenes like Jay Sin where the guy gets some in the ass too?
[/quote]

during times like that? i always rely on my trusty earphones.

[t.j. the pimp]

[quote name='Finnfist' date='04 July 2011 - 11:01 PM' timestamp='1309845667' post='346007']
In my opinion, the best 'porn' is people wanting to fuck (or do whatever else) and that then being professionally filmed. Anything else takes away from it.

Especially annoying are aspects showing the porn production side of things, e.g.:
-still pictures being taken at the time of filming (shutter noise, flash,...)
-commenting from behind the camera (unless it's gonzo and the cameraperson is also involved in the action)
-semi-documentary-like approach, e.g. discussion of a 'scene' before the action
-music and sound effects, I don't remember a time they would've brought anything positive to the mix, so real sounds only
-heavy/clumsy editing, jumping from one thing to another
-last and but not least, acting, some plot here or there is ok to set up the action, but if the people involved are not into doing it for real, it definitely shows

For these reasons, I definitely prefer the likes of LysXtreme and DirtyGardenGirl that are into it for themselves, i.e. would be doing the same with or without any cameras. Alysa, Isabella and others surely must enjoy everything anal and pushing their limits, unfortunately too often the productions are holding their talent back.
[/quote]


i, for one, just look at porn for the different variety of fetishes...
(worrying about all that shit you said, makes me dick go soft.)
life's too short to be worrying about your laundry list of defects.

[Pecadillo]

Socks and shoes ... I mean I've had gf's who say lose the socks or you're getting nothing and wtf wears 4 inch heels in bed or where ever !

So what is it with socks !

Don't look at the camera, don't look at the camera, don't look ... you have a pink hole or hard cock or whatever and it deserves all your attention and no it doesn't make you look coy, cute or desirable, it makes you look like you want it to be over so you get paid for it

Lastly lesbian or girl on girl porn, one lick doesn't make you bi or lesbian, and don't look like it's ewww, if you don't like pussy don't do girl on girl, there is nothing worse that looking like you're only in it for the $$$$$$

[Finnfist]

[quote name='ultimate gigalo' date='05 July 2011 - 06:22 PM' timestamp='1309879373' post='346351']
life's too short to be worrying about your laundry list of defects.
[/quote]

I'm not one bit worried about those things, I just don't get anything out of watching a making-of documentary. As for any specific type of action, I avoided those as everyone obviously has their own preferences.

[Guest deeply]

How there's a glut, and then a giant lacking of content. There can be weeks that go by, without something usable.

Web cams come in handy, but it's a pain to setup appropriate scheduling, as well as long waits before and in-between action.

Have to rely on constantly outsourcing data about what girl, where and when. And some of them are close to chest: they end up being whisked off their feet, by even simply a "one time" deal. Then they think they can "enhance" themselves, by deviating either in looks, personality or content (or all three)... as well as reducing their work rate.

It's like pulling teeth sometimes, even when having widespread access, to any and every location, at no financial cost.

When girls are predisposed to do non-dominant sexual acts, they don't half have a tendency to get lead astray. Edited July 14, 2011 by deeply