QUOTE(Caleb Extreme @ May 19 2007, 12:11 AM) [snapback]23250[/snapback] Am I the only one here who finds these terms rather off-putting, if not slightly offensive? And maybe I'm just overly pragmatic, but I don't see the necessity of calling my asshole anything but an asshole, or any anatomically synonymous term. For one, though my website is marketed towards gay men, and I have no problem with it whatsoever, I am not gay. Furthermore, while the act of fisting lends itself very easily to the dom/sub dynamic, I am not a true submissive. I'm not into being dominated, punished, belittled, effeminized, and so forth, and I find it belittling when somebody calls my hole a boypussy. If you prefer to call your own asshole one of these terms, I suppose that's all well and good for you, but can't it just be an orifice in its own right instead of an imitation of a vagina? Hi Caleb, Yes I remember I've called you so in one of the forum threads. Sorry if you misunderstood me, probably its also because English is not my native language. I am also not gay, but I am bi-sexual. For me, widening the asshole, by some means also leads to having "ass pussy" and "mancunt" and I do not understand what offensive you find in it. If we talk about psychology, everything is running around dick and pussy. Any sexual activity is around it. It can be sublimated in many different forms (many things could replace pussy, as many things could replace dick), but the results would be around same. I also think all people are very different, so it is sometimes difficult to find a mediation language which everyone would understand. Personally, I like the fact of being both man and woman, in some meanings. I can fuck, and I also can take penis in my ass. When I fuck, I am in male position, and call things like penis and asshole. When someone fucking me, I imagine myself as being a woman, and my asshole is "pussy". And I do not find it offensive at all, at least in such position. A.