Content speculation

[Guest deeply]

Obviously, web cam content is lost to server overflows, being in temporary file folders. Thousands of hours, perhaps... of decent content, not recorded, not shared.

Then there's peer to peer video call services, such as Skype. Again, thousands of hours.

Don't forget action left on editor's drives... as well as action not even filmed.

Maybe bumperfan could write a poem about every lost content opportunity... sigh.

OK, maybe it's impertinent to expect EVERY decent footage to be out there... maybe not.

Is it shame or privacy? Are they identical?

Why is it a modality, that a watchable kiss and tell, is frowned upon? When will this not restrict mobility in society?

Deception itself should be frowned upon. Privacy should either be all, or none. Most girls of this world, are ready and willing to have their photograph taken, perhaps even filmed... but somehow, providing content is intrusive.

If a girl masturbates, and it's not available to anyone in future to see, is it a waste, or a liberty?

What this industry is lacking, is intensification. Capitalism has caused poor management and organization to run wild on bandwidth.

Maybe it's lacking discretion: mainstream is too staged, obviously. It's most definitely a philosophical proposition, that most don't cross a line with: if sexual activity, what then? With whom? Where? When? Filmed or not? Free or not? Private or public? Staged, planned or spontaneous?

How much is too needy? How much is deprivation? Lost of questions, subjective answers.

Perhaps constructing some kind of logic to this situation would be apt. Any debaters?