flooby

One of the best I have ever seen, who is she? : https://thisvid.com/videos/anal-squirt2/

http://www.rosebuttboard.com/index.php?showuser=24931 There used to be some fantastic extreme anal videos of her but she seems to have vanished, and clips can't be found anymore. Anyone know if she has anew web site?

These pictures have exactly WHAT to do with "black" guys? Not a damn thing. But they're nice pics.

QUOTE(marci @ Nov 6 2007, 04:57 AM) [snapback]62961[/snapback] my antivirus and spyware terminator was both shouting at me with warnings at this filejungle pichoster here is the pic on fapomatic: I just got my browser hijacked. No doubt that this server should NEVER be used here again. Pretty sure I've gotten my windows registry corrupted by this one click, and will spend HOURS re-writing it. Wish I'd read this before I clicked, but thanks.

There is nothing ANYWHERE. All gone:(

QUOTE(analqueen @ Jun 25 2007, 10:25 AM) [snapback]33169[/snapback] Hi^^ Would it be dangerous if i would let a coke bottle(those made out of glass,the old ones) http://www.solarnavigator.net/solar_cola/c...mas_bottles.jpg in my ass,while im sleeping.? About 4 years ago, my anal crazy wife said she wanted to see how long she could leave a very thick vibrator up her ass. It was 2.5 inches with a head of 2.75 inches, and 6 inches long. We tied her crotch to her waist with with an old bathrobe belt to make sure it didn't fall out. She fell asleep -sort of- and it was up there for around 7 hours all together, buzzing on high the whole time. When we took it out, she said her ass was "going crazy", spasming. It didn't stop for the entire day, so the next day we took her to the doctor. Her butt was still twitching, opening and closing involuntarilly. We told the doc about our experiment, and fortunately, the doctor was a woman who was very non-judgemental. She said there was no permanent damage, and that it'd go away. It finally did on the third day. What I don't know, is whether this "problem" was caused by the dildo, or the vibrations. I suggest if you try it, you do it on a weekend; My wife couldn't really control her bowels very well while this was happening. BTW, it gave her one hell of a swollen set of ass lips when we pulled it out.

Hello.....This portion of the forum is for posting direct links to movies which fit the catagory listed, NOT for commercial web pages with links to other commercial web pages.

Warning: Malicious html on this site hijacks browser with multiple page loads. Even Firefox.

Well, youy're right; it's NOT "natural". But that doesn't stop me from wanting to vomit at the sight of hairy legs on a woman. I remember when I was about 13, my friend had a sister who was a hippy. One day she wore a dress, and she had prolific black leg hair like a man. I was immediately totally revolted, and since that day, nothing has changed. I STILL can't get that image out of my mind actually. YUCK!!! I don't even like pubic hair on women; I prefere the only hair on a woman to be her eyebrows, and on the head. That is what seems "right" to me. But why is this? I don't know. I just find body hair on women repulsive. Maybe it's cultural conditioning. But that doesn't change the feeling. Not everything "natural" is attractive. Wrinkles, stretch marks, and scars aren't attractive either are they. Brushed white teeth also are not "natural" post childhood, but hell if I'll apologize for insisting on them. I don't like that some women ought to get hung up on it though on some kind of "politically correct" agenda. I'm a very hairy guy, but if shaving my chest would get me laid more often, I'd do it in a heart beat. Since most women can get laid any time they want, I figure that's why some of them don't much care what we think. Well, I simply dislike women like this; if they they don't care what I think, to hell with them. Simple as that. QUOTE(Minx @ May 17 2007, 04:15 PM) [snapback]22964[/snapback] Hiya I'm watching a program on TV at the moment about hairy women and it's shocking and funny all at the same time! They're chatting to various people and the reactions from most of the blokes are quite frankly disgusting...but completely normal. Why is it expected for women to do x, y and z as part of a normal routine? Since when did it become a "natural" state of affairs? So what do you think? Does it bother you? One man said he'd order his girlfriend to shave if she hadn't... Whats an acceptable level of hairiness? Tell me all!

QUOTE(Bimboy @ May 15 2007, 11:07 PM) [snapback]22379[/snapback] Can't be done. The amount of cum you shoot is directly proportionate to the size of your balls, simply. ........... No it's not. Balls have nothing to do with liquid ejaculate (cum). Balls make sperm cells. Those are added to ejaculate at orgasm, but they make up only a tiny percentage of the ejaculate. Ejaculate's visable volume is made by other glands, mainly the prostate. If someone wants to increase the volume of ejaculate, I know of one method that definately does work: Repeatedly work yourself almost to the point of orgasm, then stop. Do this three to six times over a couple of hours, and you'll shoot a huge load, and you'll also be amazed how far it goes. I once shot over a quarter of a cup aftter doing this. I have also heard that taking supplemental zinc, helps replenish ejaculate.

It would be very nice to know whether these are male, or female before I expend my limited rapidshare DL on something I may not want. AGAIN, this forum needs seperate male/female sections IMO; most posters are NOT providing this information, and most posters here (according to past polls anyway) are here to see women. People end up downloading material they may not want because of the lack of clarity. This doesn't have to be about "prejudice"; preference isn't "prejudice". It doesn't even have to be about preference; as a practical matter, if I spend 20 minutes downloading a file from rapidshare and it turns out to be male because no one has been considerate enough to tell me what it is, I then LOSE my ability to continue to download files I might actually want on rapid share for several hours. Sorry, but THAT SUCKS ASS. If I don't know in advance whether posted material is male or female, I don't even download it any more, not out of "prejudice", but because it ends up preventing me from downloading material again for up to two hours. With all due respect, "a rose is NOT a rose" as far as I, and many others are concerned. I'd just like to know why some people here seem to insist that everyone here see the male material whether they want to or not, as a condition of viewing the forum. I realize the owners have that right, but given the majority opinion here, I can't help but wonder why they insist on a format that's so problematical for so many. It smacks of a misguided "tolerance" by force agenda to me. It's not about "tolerance" on my end; it's simply about being allowed to make an informed choice. Tell me I'm wrong.

QUOTE(Chachitb @ May 7 2007, 09:27 AM) [snapback]19538[/snapback] No, she doesn't Gapeee, but she is a Moderator on fistashka forum. What is this "fistashka" forum you mention and do you have a link please?

QUOTE(anllover @ May 7 2007, 06:36 AM) [snapback]19485[/snapback] look closer it looks like a GREAT link to me. thanks for the post chataigne73. i like it alot! I see off the shelf commercial hardcore and nothing extreme. I also notice "de téléchargement". Doesn't that mean this is a pay site that bills your phone to a German phone number?

QUOTE(Chachitb @ May 7 2007, 09:27 AM) [snapback]19538[/snapback] No, she doesn't Gapeee, but she is a Moderator on fistashka forum. Please provide a link!

Looks like just another commercial porn advertising site to me.

He's been up our asses for six fucking years and only the criminally insane enjoyed it.

QUOTE(stephcleo @ Apr 27 2007, 02:49 AM) [snapback]15979[/snapback] This doesn't make an OUNCE of sense. None. 1. Anyone actually concerned about not wanting their digital data "spread around" does NOT make it freely available ANYWHERE. 2. Just exactly how is someone making money by re-posting their vid to rapidshare, a service which doesn't charge? 3. If they don't want people DL'ing their stuff on rapidshare, then WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY TAKE IT OFF OF SURFOO? Ridicules. 4. Even a child understands that once digital data is posted and the first copy is in someone else's possession, they have ZERO control over it's further distribution. I think someone maybe finally hit their brain with a dildo Flobby It's exact that we stay real amateurs and we could earn loy of money if we sell Cleo's vids and pix....We don't want to be real amateurs and it's exact all our pix and vids are free ,we make them only for fun and amateurs of fisting...We only want that you respects our minds ,i's so difficult?? We could make money like denni 'O or others and all our pix would be marked by copyright and never post somewhere without juridic issue!!We don't want that so the only thing we tell it's a minimum of RESPECT of our desir...If like by the past,we find all our pix&vids in paid site because they are diffused everywhere by everyone,we'll have to do like you Flobby(Do you post something personal on web?),we don't post our personal pix and vids,we keep them really private and no one on the net could show them,it's what you want Flobby? You know when i was younger,i was searching for very good fisting amateurs,and sometimes i found something but the most time found somthing free and cool!...I only want that real amateur of fisting have not to pay everytime to watch something really cool and new....yours Steph & Cleo No, I NEVER post something personal on the web. Once you do that, it's no longer going to be personal. You can not control what anyone does, once it's been posted in one place, for one second. I don't know why you don't understand that. I can't make sense of what you're saying. You think you can put something on the web for someone, and then not end up with it everywhere, especially if it involves sex? That's just crazy. I don't have a dog in this fight. But if you don't want people going to rapidshare, don't take it off surfoo, because that INSURES that's where they will go. Finally, if you DON'T want to make money from providing this stuff online, then why do you care what anyone does with it? Again, I can't comprehend what you're really trying to say.

zi

That is one huge, ruined, gaping slot there.

QUOTE(bumperfan @ Apr 24 2007, 08:31 PM) [snapback]15160[/snapback] Steph & cleo have a very big issue with thier vids being spread around without thier consent- they posted a new set on surfoo.c,today ( a free site for gaping pussy where xthorgal is part of the admin at, they are pretty strict about no dicks allowed, but that is where stephcleo are posting when they DO post, these days) & I already see a hungry poster running theif RS link here! I posted earlier today the thought that anyone who wants their new vid could go to surfoo & say thanks to the maker, stephcleo, rather than the poster who did not make the vid or give credit to where he got it! I think they would like the thanks, you all, & since they used to post here before, maybe if a few of us visited surfoo & said thanks for thier new post, they might come back--- but be quick!!! They earase their posts the next DAY to keep the vultures from putting them on the web to make money off of!!! Bumperfan This doesn't make an OUNCE of sense. None. 1. Anyone actually concerned about not wanting their digital data "spread around" does NOT make it freely available ANYWHERE. 2. Just exactly how is someone making money by re-posting their vid to rapidshare, a service which doesn't charge? 3. If they don't want people DL'ing their stuff on rapidshare, then WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY TAKE IT OFF OF SURFOO? Ridicules. 4. Even a child understands that once digital data is posted and the first copy is in someone else's possession, they have ZERO control over it's further distribution. I think someone maybe finally hit their brain with a dildo.

Lots of people post there, how about a link to them?

MOST links work: http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....=harrylube&OB=D USED http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....hickenbone&OB=D http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....B=micha911&OB=D scat nov http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....%5Flover06&OB=D anal and gape http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....&SB=bdpaar&OB=D very used http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....SB=janandy&OB=D used asshole http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....B=HerrSado&OB=D anal stretching December http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....7Beautiful&OB=D rosebutt http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....&SB=rsa911&OB=D rosebutt http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....=scuandjim&OB=D http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....7Beautiful&OB=D rosebutt March 07 http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....knoeterich&OB=D huge gaping asshole April 07 http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....&SB=emka65&OB=D well used ass http://www.newbienudes.com/Photos/default....amfun4ne1&OB=D# gaping stretched ass

Unfortunately she never seems to get more than 2 or 3 inches into herself of either dildo.

Faked. Obviously they substituted a vastly shorter plunger for the scenes where it appears fully engulfed. There's just no non-lethal way to accomplish this; it would have ruptured her colon at the first turn.

A poll about this was run in a previous incarnation of the forum and the overwhelming majority of votes went to seperating the genders. But it apparently doesn't matter to the owner of the forum what most people want, and being his forum, it is his right I suppose. But given his position, I can't help but feel that for some reason, he wants people to see what they don't particularily care to see, in order to be here. I don't know what the motivation fpr that would be. Maybe he thinks it increases tolerance and/or acceptance. It hasn't changed my taste (women only).