Do you like my prolapse?

[SolaG1998]

https://www.reddit.com/user/SolaG1998/comments/qcjgm5/hi_everyone_im_asking_for_all_the_help_i_can_get/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

 

this is what I’ve been working on for four years. I’m new to this site so I hope you like 

[Darthvin]

Very nice sola - did you pump at all or just train with larger toys/fists etc. 

[Rosebutt]

Solag, you’ve been on this site for quite a while actually.

[tom255]

If you ask that so be a brave to get also receive negative feedback.

To be honest. I don't like you at all, pretty much discuss. You not honest and I bet that you don't like fact that you have a prolapse, no drive, no passion. Pure money and even this post is ask for help.

[tommm123]

" as exiting as watching paint dry. "

[NeutralOmen]

Yes not to make you feel unwelcome here, but you have a bit of a reputation in this community for being hawkish and disingenuous. We are a community of fetishists and enthusiasts who genuinely find extreme anal body modification indescribably erotic. We can smell from a mile away a person whose sole interest is capitalizing on this niche. We aren't just faceless wallets to be exploited. 
We understand your prolapse is the result of a medical condition that you yourself don't find particularly erotic, but have decided to capitalize on. More power to you, but that's not what this community is about. 

As was pointed out earlier, your first ingratiation into this community is yet another attempt to hawk your wares. 

Plenty of prolapsing women have converted their prolapse into a money maker. That in and of itself isn't so bad, but basically, the more we can imagine the girl having the fetish on her own, who would be dutifully training and ruining her ass on her own in private because SHE likes is, the more interested we tend to be. 

Even the really heavy hitters, HotkinkyJo, Dirtygardengirl, Siswet, and even Clairet, aren't considered the highest grade performers, because as nice and enthusiastic as they all are, we can all kind of tell it's not THEIR private sexuality. It's usually a mix of general submission, masochistic submission, combined with a natural talent for anal training and probably the orbit of a dominant or two whose fetishes imprinted on them. The result is, while they're not "not" into it, we can tell it's not their own private fantasy. 

The highest grade performers in public life for those of us here are Vixenmoon, MercilessAnalAcrobat, Violet Buttercup, Sara Bell, and their ilk. To varying degrees, they are actually into it. They look at their ruined holes and you can see a twinkle in their eye. They work hard to ruin their asses because THEY want it. 

When it comes to your content, your only focus is on spamming people with cup-shaking appeals to sign up and give you money. You don't train your ass, you don't seem motivated to make gains, you don't treat this with any eroticism or passion. 

Don't get me wrong. I'm not anti-sex work. I'm a huge supporter. But some friendly advice(and maybe the community can back me up). Take some time to involve yourself in this community to at LEAST learn about it. Maybe join some conversations. Ask questions. Tell us about YOUR sexuality and what you actually find hot. I bet you anything you'd have more success making content that reflects who you are in terms of your sexual identity rather than trying to squeeze every penny you can out of a medical condition(which by the way, I hope doesn't cause you any discomfort).

We welcome you to this community, but please respect that it's a COMMUNITY, not another platform for you to hawk your wares. 

 

[redrick]

4 hours ago, tom255 said:

If you ask that so be a brave to get also receive negative feedback.

To be honest. I don't like you at all, pretty much discuss. You not honest and I bet that you don't like fact that you have a prolapse, no drive, no passion. Pure money and even this post is ask for help.

I have to agree with you on that, and if you say get on reddit and surf prolapse porn you will have a fuck ton of the same image from her posted everywhere. One day i counted and it totaled lik34 times

 

[meganuke40]

A woman who's an 8/10 in looks/figure and has no apparent fetishes on display still inspires excitement because of the fantasy of what one imagines enjoying doing with her.

A woman who's a 4/10 in looks/figure and has lots of obvious fetishes she's passionate about inspires excitement because of the fantasy of what she's she's enjoying doing to herself.

A woman who's a 4/10 in looks/figure and has made it very plain and public that she doesn't have fetishes, but wants to passionlessly capitalize on your fetish by pretending, inspires excitement in very, very few people.

It's generous to describe this person as a 4/10 in looks/figure. That's not an insult, it's just a fact, unless her appearance and physique is someone's specific fetish, she is not an attractive person.

[NeutralOmen]

2 hours ago, meganuke40 said:

A woman who's an 8/10 in looks/figure and has no apparent fetishes on display still inspires excitement because of the fantasy of what one imagines enjoying doing with her.

A woman who's a 4/10 in looks/figure and has lots of obvious fetishes she's passionate about inspires excitement because of the fantasy of what she's she's enjoying doing to herself.

A woman who's a 4/10 in looks/figure and has made it very plain and public that she doesn't have fetishes, but wants to passionlessly capitalize on your fetish by pretending, inspires excitement in very, very few people.

It's generous to describe this person as a 4/10 in looks/figure. That's not an insult, it's just a fact, unless her appearance and physique is someone's specific fetish, she is not an attractive person.

I don't think it's necessary to body shame or appearance shame anyone here. Everyone finds all different kinds of people attractive. 

I think a more constructive takeaway is, the reason this community dislikes SlolaG has nothing to do with her physical appearance.

[meganuke40]

3 hours ago, NeutralOmen said:

I don't think it's necessary to body shame or appearance shame anyone here. Everyone finds all different kinds of people attractive. 

I think a more constructive takeaway is, the reason this community dislikes SlolaG has nothing to do with her physical appearance.

It absolutely is a factor for most people and it's unrealistic to claim otherwise. Yes, everyone has differing POV on what is physically attractive and what isn't. There's also such a thing as majority and minority. The majority of people who find women physically attractive will find HKJ far, far more physically attractive than SolaG. That's not shaming. It's just a plain fact that her physical appearance is not what the average person who finds women attractive considers to be attractive.

Guaranteed, if SolaG were as passionless and money-grabbing as she is, but she had HKJ's appearance, less people would care that she was passionless and money-grabbing. It's a factor. That's just life. 

[Albertel]

7 hours ago, NeutralOmen said:

Yes not to make you feel unwelcome here, but you have a bit of a reputation in this community for being hawkish and disingenuous. We are a community of fetishists and enthusiasts who genuinely find extreme anal body modification indescribably erotic. We can smell from a mile away a person whose sole interest is capitalizing on this niche. We aren't just faceless wallets to be exploited. 
We understand your prolapse is the result of a medical condition that you yourself don't find particularly erotic, but have decided to capitalize on. More power to you, but that's not what this community is about. 

As was pointed out earlier, your first ingratiation into this community is yet another attempt to hawk your wares. 

Plenty of prolapsing women have converted their prolapse into a money maker. That in and of itself isn't so bad, but basically, the more we can imagine the girl having the fetish on her own, who would be dutifully training and ruining her ass on her own in private because SHE likes is, the more interested we tend to be. 

Even the really heavy hitters, HotkinkyJo, Dirtygardengirl, Siswet, and even Clairet, aren't considered the highest grade performers, because as nice and enthusiastic as they all are, we can all kind of tell it's not THEIR private sexuality. It's usually a mix of general submission, masochistic submission, combined with a natural talent for anal training and probably the orbit of a dominant or two whose fetishes imprinted on them. The result is, while they're not "not" into it, we can tell it's not their own private fantasy. 

The highest grade performers in public life for those of us here are Vixenmoon, MercilessAnalAcrobat, Violet Buttercup, Sara Bell, and their ilk. To varying degrees, they are actually into it. They look at their ruined holes and you can see a twinkle in their eye. They work hard to ruin their asses because THEY want it. 

When it comes to your content, your only focus is on spamming people with cup-shaking appeals to sign up and give you money. You don't train your ass, you don't seem motivated to make gains, you don't treat this with any eroticism or passion. 

Don't get me wrong. I'm not anti-sex work. I'm a huge supporter. But some friendly advice(and maybe the community can back me up). Take some time to involve yourself in this community to at LEAST learn about it. Maybe join some conversations. Ask questions. Tell us about YOUR sexuality and what you actually find hot. I bet you anything you'd have more success making content that reflects who you are in terms of your sexual identity rather than trying to squeeze every penny you can out of a medical condition(which by the way, I hope doesn't cause you any discomfort).

We welcome you to this community, but please respect that it's a COMMUNITY, not another platform for you to hawk your wares. 

 

Aye aye! Well said!

[NeutralOmen]

39 minutes ago, meganuke40 said:

It absolutely is a factor for most people and it's unrealistic to claim otherwise. Yes, everyone has differing POV on what is physically attractive and what isn't. There's also such a thing as majority and minority. The majority of people who find women physically attractive will find HKJ far, far more physically attractive than SolaG. That's not shaming. It's just a plain fact that her physical appearance is not what the average person who finds women attractive considers to be attractive.

Guaranteed, if SolaG were as passionless and money-grabbing as she is, but she had HKJ's appearance, less people would care that she was passionless and money-grabbing. It's a factor. That's just life. 

Just because you're pointing something out that may be a normative trend in how attractiveness is perceived, doubling down on this position is still hardcore body shaming. 

Why do you feel the need to say this and say it twice? There is no need to be so mean-spirited. 

I think it's fine to give constructive feedback and advice to someone in SolaG's position when trying to enter this community of all places, but reminding a human being that "on average, people don't find them attractive," it's just unkind. Maybe you might want to resist your impulse to express such things.

[meganuke40]

4 hours ago, NeutralOmen said:

Just because you're pointing something out that may be a normative trend in how attractiveness is perceived, doubling down on this position is still hardcore body shaming. 

Why do you feel the need to say this and say it twice? There is no need to be so mean-spirited. 

I think it's fine to give constructive feedback and advice to someone in SolaG's position when trying to enter this community of all places, but reminding a human being that "on average, people don't find them attractive," it's just unkind. Maybe you might want to resist your impulse to express such things.

Just a reminder, you're posting this on a website that's fundamentally about a bunch of horny people illegally redistributing copyrighted fetish porn. Go look in your mirror and ask yourself who you are while you're fapping to stolen videos of women who more often than not describe what they're doing to their bodies as "destruction" and who actively pursue humiliating and degrading commentary from their viewers. I don't think your horse is as white as you believe it is, knight. That'll be all I have to say to you about it.

[NeutralOmen]

4 hours ago, meganuke40 said:

Just a reminder, you're posting this on a website that's fundamentally about a bunch of horny people illegally redistributing copyrighted fetish porn. Go look in your mirror and ask yourself who you are while you're fapping to stolen videos of women who more often than not describe what they're doing to their bodies as "destruction" and who actively pursue humiliating and degrading commentary from their viewers. I don't think your horse is as white as you believe it is, knight. That'll be all I have to say to you about it.

You're making a lot of assumptions. I buy content from performers I like whenever I can.

I am the kind of dominant who likes women who actively like to dedegraded, but ONLY if they actively like it. There are ways to go about this fetish and this world ethically, and I think it's worth examining that, instead of maybe listening to what someone is telling you, you TRIPLE down and start to implicate my character. Sounds like you'll literally do anything but acknowledge that maybe you were a little needlessly cruel in bringing someone's physical appearance into this.

It's easy if you try dude. I'm sure personal growth is a lot like being an assassin. It gets easier every time.

[tommm123]

i don't think she will ever visit this topic again, more like fire and forget You guys brought interesting arguments however.

[Rosebutt]

She’s disingenuous. That’s all there is to it.