Jump to content

argendana


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, marcus4us said:

i meant free of charge of course as there is nothing good to support bad habbits/behavior 

Porn can also be considered a bad habit/behavior, so by your logic, I can't link you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She's a good gal and I've spent money to help her as I have other producers of fine amateur extreme anal porn.

Go ahead and do the same so she keeps producing more of this wonderful smut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, soulsync said:

Porn can also be considered a bad habit/behavior, so by your logic, I can't link you.

you shouldn't muddle things in order to lobotomize me but this is how things are done today : people using words of which they don't have the first clue.

Pornography or porn is the nasty habbit of making easy money by selling sexual conducts, moneytizing to the last bit of human behavior, not for the fun of it in by doing so getting high but for the sake of money, being the little ass capitalist in that particular matter.

So.. watching sexual behaviors isn't blameworthy, making porn by selling your ass in usually poor manner is. Anymore question ?

And by the way, such an answer, yours, is not only stupid and not civilian (in a forum) but useless : if you're not entitled to add something positive why bother ?

Edited by marcus4us
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AzFrNick said:

She's a good gal and I've spent money to help her as I have other producers of fine amateur extreme anal porn.

Go ahead and do the same so she keeps producing more of this wonderful smut.

so... as you've spent money you project to gain back more and that's making her a good gal ? And to do what ? The same aesthetic/content of 98% of wworld porn ? For her (yours) credit, she, at least, uses some sepia light making her movies much more enjoyable than the shitty legalporno or such stuff for instance.

Shouldn't your approach be "she's so into this and get so much pleasure from it that she decided to share it with others" ? or if you prefer, people are complaining of todays's society but are doing everything for it to continue and grow, 'the snake chewing it's tail' kinda or in one word 'entropy'... No wonder why everything everywhere has the red light on !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, marcus4us said:

so... as you've spent money you project to gain back more and that's making her a good gal ? And to do what ? The same aesthetic/content of 98% of wworld porn ? For her (yours) credit, she, at least, uses some sepia light making her movies much more enjoyable than the shitty legalporno or such stuff for instance.

Shouldn't your approach be "she's so into this and get so much pleasure from it that she decided to share it with others" ? or if you prefer, people are complaining of todays's society but are doing everything for it to continue and grow, 'the snake chewing it's tail' kinda or in one word 'entropy'... No wonder why everything everywhere has the red light on !

No I just like to financially help.

No need to write a novel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, marcus4us said:

you shouldn't muddle things in order to lobotomize me but this is how things are done today : people using words of which they don't have the first clue.

Pornography or porn is the nasty habbit of making easy money by selling sexual conducts, moneytizing to the last bit of human behavior, not for the fun of it in by doing so getting high but for the sake of money, being the little ass capitalist in that particular matter.

So.. watching sexual behaviors isn't blameworthy, making porn by selling your ass in usually poor manner is. Anymore question ?

And by the way, such an answer, yours, is not only stupid and not civilian (in a forum) but useless : if you're not entitled to add something positive why bother ?

Indeed, you shouldn't talk about things you don't have the first clue about.

There's nothing wrong with making money by selling "sexual conducts", it's a job. Nothing's inherently wrong with capitalism either. Sure some people do it out of desperation, but many do it because they enjoy it. You confuse individuals for an entire porn industry. I'm leaning on the likelihood that Argendana would be doing these sexual things off camera anyway, so she might as well make some money off of it.

You could argue that porn is inherently blameworthy as it is a dopamine sink, leading you astray for your highest potential in life, which would better benefit society.

I originally replied because your comment was just hilariously ironic.

Any more questions?

Edited by soulsync
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, soulsync said:

-  There's nothing wrong with making money by selling "sexual conducts", it's a job.

- Nothing's inherently wrong with capitalism either.

- Sure some people do it out of desperation, but many do it because they enjoy it.

- I'm leaning on the likelihood that Argendana would be doing these sexual things off camera anyway, so she might as well make some money off of it.

- You could argue that porn is inherently blameworthy as it is a dopamine sink, leading you astray for your highest potential in life, which would better benefit society.

-Any more questions?

In fact none, rather some clarifications you obviously need.

prostitutes also say that there is nothing wrong by doing what they do for a living : it's a job...

Nothing wrong with capitalism either... You're so right ! This world is a shit hole where almost every body would kill for some cash or walk on others, environmental/societal/financial/human departments have all the red light flashing but "nothing's wrong with it".. I am afraid I can't do a thing for you here.

Some people do it because they enjoy it (and not out of desperation or easy money).. Again,  you're so riiigghhhtt ! Besides insdustrially made porn where all is done in a corporate/business way (behaviors, talks, moanings, etc... so all is fake), I don't see many so called amateurs material where main caracters, at least women as it is somehow different for men, climax for what they're doing and you know why, you've said it already : IT'S A JOB ! You don't get high on job, you just do it, the good american way for entertainment sake, no matter the down levelling of things, no matter the fake they are, while you're making money off it.

She WOULD be doing it off camera.. I dont' know that as she's doing it for money and obviously not for the kink of it (as I have to number the videos where she climaxed doing it). Such a difference...

 

!'m glad she does it but it's just a shame she (and all the likes) does it this way.

 

Edited by marcus4us
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/28/2019 at 6:06 AM, marcus4us said:

In fact none, rather some clarifications you obviously need.

prostitutes also say that there is nothing wrong by doing what they do for a living : it's a job...

Nothing wrong with capitalism either... You're so right ! This world is a shit hole where almost every body would kill for some cash or walk on others, environmental/societal/financial/human departments have all the red light flashing but "nothing's wrong with it".. I am afraid I can't do a thing for you here.

Some people do it because they enjoy it (and not out of desperation or easy money).. Again,  you're so riiigghhhtt ! Besides insdustrially made porn where all is done in a corporate/business way (behaviors, talks, moanings, etc... so all is fake), I don't see many so called amateurs material where main caracters, at least women as it is somehow different for men, climax for what they're doing and you know why, you've said it already : IT'S A JOB ! You don't get high on job, you just do it, the good american way for entertainment sake, no matter the down levelling of things, no matter the fake they are, while you're making money off it.

She WOULD be doing it off camera.. I dont' know that as she's doing it for money and obviously not for the kink of it (as I have to number the videos where she climaxed doing it). Such a difference...

 

!'m glad she does it but it's just a shame she (and all the likes) does it this way.

What about prostitutes? It's a job. They're not wrong.

You seem to confused and lump things together. Here are some clarifications you obviously need.

Capitalism is the best and only system that's ever worked, the only thing that pushes scientific and technological innovation. What would you prefer, communism?  How will you incentivize people to do any meaningful, quality work without a hierarchy to climb? You could say that communism is actually built on fundamentally more virtuous ideals than capitalism, yet any attempted application in history has led people to commit inhumanly heinous crimes. Now how could a more well-intentioned system lead to something so tragic as opposed a less well-intentioned system leading to so much good? Here's the kicker; no system exists in a vacuum, they're machines, their output is determined on what is input. Now, what is the input? Human society. You overgeneralize and oversimplify the negative side of humanity for the sake of your weak argument and understanding of economics and social psychology. Look at the diseases we've eradicated, child mortality rates are lower than they've ever been, none of which would have been possible without capitalistic incentivization; it does greater good than harm. But does capitalism incentivize the bad as well? Yes, and here's why; it's a resource distribution system, not a social wellbeing system. Humanity is lacking in the latter system, but it is developing them, and is particularly progressive in Nordic and some European countries. Such systems include: taxes, free education, universal basic income; which will be a reality if Americans elect Andrew Yang as their next president. If you imagine a world where these wellbeing systems hold precedence over any other system, now capitalism seems just. So you see, you confused both, and lumped them into one. You're not mad at capitalism, you're mad at the lack of social wellbeing systems, and wrongfully attribute the negativity manifested to whatever economic system that happens to be dominant at the moment.

On the porn thing, again you confuse a whole industry for individuals who do it because they enjoy it. They don't need to climax on camera, they're putting on a show, it's like acting. They can very well climax off camera. They do a job that's more enjoyable than most jobs and they get paid, it's a perfectly fine job, I don't see what your point is. You see kids shows, the presenters and hosts are acting more happy and lively than they do in real life. Do you find something wrong with that?

As for Argendana herself, she clearly does it because she likes it. How can you tell? Because it's extreme, nobody would push their body to such extremes for the measly amount of money she's probably making for it. Just because she isn't climaxing doesn't mean she isn't enjoying it either.

Edited by soulsync
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.