Jump to content

Truly

Members
  • Posts

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Truly

Previous Fields

  • Gender:
    Male
  • Country:
    Earth
  • Your anus have:
    Not say
  • Year of birth:
    1981

Truly's Achievements

Poster

Poster (4/11)

0

Reputation

  1. I can't wait for GTA 4... That's about the only thing that's woken me up in gaming news atm. I play puzzlequest on the DS, and my PSP is busy gathering dust for a decent title to come out. My ps3 is busy gathering dust also, while I use my 360's HD DVD add-on.
  2. It has come to my attention over the years, as it would with statistical information, that the people who smoke, and are involved in pornography on a performing scale, are more common. The same can be said with substance abuse, and excessive alcohol consumption. Do you worry about their health? I never like to see a good looking woman smoke, what's your opinion? Is the lifestyle really a long one? Pornstars, are a bit like footballers, and some other professional, physical intensive sports: they have a shlef life of around the mid-30s mark.
  3. You can shake your fist at her in a romantic way, now.
  4. Whatever. I'll just remember the "Moderators can post absolute bullshit once a month" as one of the rules.
  5. I said I'm selling them. Wonder why (for many reasons, but your spot on with some of the criticism of him)? Yes... ofc it's meant to be aimed at a child's mind... I started reading them when I was 7. Why do you think they are so well illustrated? You do not need to read in-between the lines to see that, fool. I don't like you spitting on his imagination. I felt his universe had a Tolkien-eque feeling, and I haven't gotten that from anything other that's widely read: as you said, his Dark Materials and Weaveworld are a lot...more literally astute. I create my own worlds...in my head with their own language, and history: everything the world has, but under different laws of science and perspective. Almost like playing god...in your mind. That's if you believe in religion anyway, which I don't: simply a waste of time. This...creation in my mind is the ambition I live by...all the books I've read have been the tools to create it...metaphorically, at least. Not fiction worthy, but creation worthy. I want to wonder beyond the walls of the universe, even the mutliverse. I desire the supernatural, even: but within my own invention. That's why I learn so much: what knowledge I need to possess to create my world, my universe is everything the universe possesses. Then maybe, I can think outside the box to even outer-universal proportions...and defy all probability to revolutionise my existance. Go me. So you have the complete works of clive barker? Hmm...haven't read him for 6 months. And G: ahh ok. I think pro has said what I would've done...but a bit more cynically. You need to create a collective opinion, anyway pro: read all his books, and some of the more complicated ones. I may have a slight bias of sentimentality to his imagination, and creativity, but that's because my Grandfather, when I was a kid, used to laugh along together about the adventures of Rincewind. He's now very old...and I worry...sorry, I don't like dealing with death close to me: because I feel it's something I cannot control. Hopefully, with medical science, I can make sure I don't have to worry about it.
  6. Don't edit my posts Tangerine.... If I wanted a smiley face I would have put one.
  7. Sounds like a fan then...NOT a stalker...fans are active in social activity...
  8. Comics for people who hate "comics" are for people who like War fiction... Trend is. Trend will always be found. IN America, it's usually Vietnam comics.
  9. You haven't comprehended my message to "perfect" summation Tang. I SAID "links." Links are those IN a topic: If they are mixed, how are we supposed to know (if we can't read unicode, which is the majority) which ones are female/male? Lucky dip? Toss a coin? Pff...>_> So I am asking...stop mixing links...or put them in separate lists, or preferrably separate topics; BOTH being labelled correctly.
  10. That would be glass rod whore, Julie Night. By the outfit, I'd say the same shoot. Should someone post the rod scene here as well? I know you have it...everyone does.
  11. A new Angelina Crow? Or am I being too presumptive?
  12. Having problem with that thumbnail^^ can't see it up close, but she looks ok. No idea from that size of pic: need a closer look. I would suggest a reupload to imagevenue, if you want me to identify it.
  13. I have to admit...being of the quite protective sorts, and also defensive sorts I don't like to post of any of my previous...misgivings...but stalking is one of them. Being a professional stalker should not be seen as stalking, in the more negative sense, AT ALL, coming from experience. It simply exists because a person will not / cannot (for celebs, especially) get sufficient attention; in the sexual case, this would be through lack of notice through flirting, or such and such. The majority of stalkers are shy, retiring types, who are VERY law-abiding and don't intend to carry out any harm on the stalkee. They are simply put, more actively-fantasising about the stalkee. I may post more of this in a new topic, about my experiences, but obviously here they would not be well outllined, being of a more specific issue. I'll just give a few stats: 85% of recognised stalkers are male. 99.9% of cases do not even get reported, if spotted. If a case is reported, the stalker becomes worried about the stalkee, and does not stalk that person under their wishes (usually). If this is not the case, he risks law enforcement aggrovation. If he does not respond to this aggrovation, he will be of the "non-enforcable" type. These people are usually the trouble-makers, and do not recognise the law as a be all end all. These people ARE NOT however, to be called rapists, etc. You have to have a detailed perspective of someone's background to even try and guess this. The problem is with this: it encourages more negative stalkers to stay stalking, and discourages positive stalkers from stalking. As soon as I was even AT RISK with aggrovation, I would stop. It's only first timers who don't stop: usually through inexperience they get caught anyway. And for all of sanity's sake, it is a very passive thing to do. A very active thing would be to assault. It's more of a kid's game: like follow the leader. It should be seen as a more active use of non-physical flirting. Of course it crosses boundaries...but so does ALL sexually-based forms of social discourse: if I touch you, and you like it...is different to I touch you and you don't...so that's harrassment. On a more lighter matter, I feel it's more of a form of flattery...as Minx said. But for future spies...and internet hackers: stealth and anonymity is something that is a value to us.
  14. And has them... Is one of them no spam?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.